Sunday, May 12, 2019

Is Religion Bad for Women's Development and the Pursuit of Gender Essay

Is Religion Bad for Womens Development and the Pursuit of Gender Equality - Essay ExampleHowever, since the south World War, religions hold become increasingly involved in developmental projects and in particular stick out played a crucial role in bringing relief to the poor. For example, in 2006, when the UKs attend of finance implemented an immunisation programme for raising 2.1 billion pounds for children under 5 globally, the first significant contributors were Pope Benedict XVI, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Chief Rabbi, the Muslim Council of Britain, the Hindu Forum of Britain and the Network of Sikh Organizations (Clarke & Jennings, 2008). Thus in determining whether or not religion is bad for womens development and the pursuit of gender equality, it is authorized to avoid focusing narrowly on extremism and radicalism and to look more closely at the contributions of moderates (Clarke & Jennings, 2008). It is also classic to acknowledge that secular approaches to dev elopment and the reduction of poverty have proven to be ineffective (Haynes, 2007). For example, in spite of secular projects in which governments have partnered with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), millions of people around the world, particularly women and the poor do not have adequate healthcargon and/or opportunities for education (Haynes, 2007, p. 9). As a result, there has been a growing flavor that secularism and faith-based organizations (FBOs) are both needed to ensure development and poverty reduction. Despite religions big and firmly established support of education for women and the poor, some doubt that religion can make a significant contribution to development (Aiken, 2010). Religious organizations and FBOs have persistently lent their support to the poor and destitute. This is peculiarly true for victims in war torn areas and areas suffering the after-effects of natural disasters. Religious organizations and FBOs provide aid in these kinds of circumstances for two reasons they recognize the values of charity and mercy and they adhere to the belief that all compassionate beings have value (Ferris, 2005, p. 313). How can these values and beliefs, particularly when put into practice, be anything but good for womens development and the pursuit of gender equality? In particular, since secularism has largely failed to achieve developmental objectives, religion was arguably the missing link between achieving development of women and gender equality. Moreover, NGOs have been more productive and effective in promoting equality and development across genders, races, ethnic groups and for providing relief to the poor and the destitute. As Ferris (2005) observes, NGOs have a much(prenominal) greater presence than governments across the globe. Many NGOs are not only operated by religions, but are also supported by religions. For example, in Asia, thousands of NGOs are operated by religious groups and individuals with religious convictions (Cand land, 2000, p. 356). Moreover, Candland (2000) argues that despite the wish of empirical evidence is quite likely that a higher percentage of family income is contributed to social welfare groups in Buddhist and Muslim Asian societies, despite the absence of tax incentives, than in European and North American Societies. Buddhists and Muslims devote significant amounts of their income to private social welfare organizations (p. 357). Therefore compared to secular states, religious states have a greater awareness of social justice. In this regard, it can be argued that since religious practices, values and beliefs are manifested by a greater awareness of social and welfare justice, religion is not bad for the development of wo

No comments:

Post a Comment