.

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Perserving Nature, Perserving Us Essay

When John Berger suggests, It is within this bleak natural condition that dealer is encountered, and the encounter is by its character sudden and unpredictable (Berger 92) he establishes that even though there are rare moments of viewer form in record, n ane of them are permanent. He goes further to explain that these moments of beauty are examples of art Art is an organized response to what nature allows us to glimpse occasionally (Berger 94). This suggests that nature is precisely comely when these infrequent flashes are captured in art. For example, the idea of the white poultry that Berger discusses in his essay is taken from nature and is molded into a delicate, precious handmade piece.When the factual bird is mentioned in his essay he says, Outside, in minus 25C, the real birds are freezing to death (Berger 94). His forthlook on nature is portrayed as beastly. Only the idea of the white bird sculpture is bonny to him. Though the suffering bird isnt the most app ealing supposition it is nature, it is real. He is referring to his idea that within these bleak natural contexts, beauty is encountered. of beauty, how stinkpot these batch continue to be so dedicated with preserving nature?It is advocated that nature is consistently beautiful alone. These organizations and groups are devoted to preserving and allowing nature to be beautiful permanently. Like Berger says art is the permanence of natures beauty, the goal of these people is to transform the art, or the instant of beauty into an endless aesthetic. A bonny moment in the eye of Berger is instants that provoke aesthetic emotion. These brief seconds in metre portray hopefulness within nature.He says that by organizing these hopeful and beautiful moments in time, art is therefore formed. Art by definition is whatsoever of various pursuits or occupations in which creative or imaginative accomplishment is applied according to aesthetic principles (OED). These moments are found so slen derly because nature is and will always be un certain(a).Even in instantlys world with all the technology, we are still not prepared for the wrath of nature, let alone to fathom how harsh or when these vol brush asideic moments will arise. The idea Berger offers that nature solely has brief periods of beauty supports my oppugn of why people try so hard to preserve nature itself. Today people are involved with environmental programs such as Greenpeace and recycling, all with the same goal of trying to preserve and save the future day of our planet. If Bergers point of view is that nature only has a certain extent of beauty, how can these people continue to preserve nature? We recover beauty all around us. It starts right here at home.organism a student at NYU its customary to walk by uppercase Square Park each day. While in the putting surface we retard many forms of art. The question arises that why in an urban urban center do we have parking lots? We have an assortm ent of pose, from central park to Union Square Park and many more than through out the city. Well the logic behind having these parks is that they portray beauty in the most desolate plains. After a long day of beingness locked up in classes, the only thing that acts as an outlet from classes and discipline is sitting in Washington Square Park. The park not only acts as an escape, still it allows one to find peace within the trying and chaotic city.When I am in the park I can release my genius as well as be one with nature. record is beautiful. Nature or these parks will always be beautiful even in the winter. How many times have you seen pictures of Washington Square Park with snow covered benches, and the frozen fountain, and it still be the most breath-taking scene? The community and these organizations thrive on remaining, and protecting parks such as these. It is because of people like this, people who care, people who see beauty where it may not be all the time is w hy nature and these parks are aesthetic. Ann Zwinger, the author of A Desert military man allegorizes the representation that nature holds.Her core ideas of endurance, empathy, and anguish that each grain of anchor holds exemplify her reason for constructing this essay. Nature gives us a certain condition for how the world cultivates itself and how it has fashioned our daily lives. Zwigger views the most desolate environment as beautiful and hopeful. Similarly, Bergers essay implies that natures beauty comes and goes whereas Zwinger makes it clear that nature always demonstrates beauty and stories.She furthers her thinking by clarifying, I harmonise the physiological adjustments of blood and urine, hearing and seeing, of adaptations in behavior that make heart in the discontinue not only possible with verve, qualities seen and unseen that darn out not only survival, but survival with zest (Zwigger 416).These things that locomote in nature are not hardly getting by, but yet t hey flourish because of innovation forced upon them when evolution occurs. It is important to record how the world came to be signifying the optimism of aesthetics, and yet there is still an immense area for development. The sight of a visually appealing landscape is irreplaceable, but overly a memorandum of where we come from. If we take a step patronize and try and interpret what Zwinger is trying to say, she is saying beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. To me what may be beautiful is the opposite of what Zwinger thinks.She views the cave and the desert to be the most beautiful thing. However, to me I find the sparkling waters in the Caribbean simply spectacular. As she finds the ability of animals to survive and evolve in the desert to be beautiful and intriguing, comparably, I find these sea creatures to be the same. The funding down of ocean spirit that is flourishing that we dont even agnise about is not only unfathomable but is beautiful. Even the isolated of n ature is beautiful. Damien Hirst perfectly depicts art that is nature frozen in time similarly to the concept that John Berger discusses in his essay.Hirsts series The snowy Cube, are these simple, transparent glass boxes with motionless animals inside them. These animals are not just examples, but they are natures beauty captured by art. This explicitly illustrates my thoughts on the biggest contrasts between how Berger views nature and my own views. I purport that by capturing these moments they become stuck or full of tension. Moreover, Hirsts artwork can are arguably not be beautiful in that life cannot be seen in these still pieces of art. On the other hand, to further my thinking, Zwinger may view his work to imprison nature.These freely roaming creatures are now fixed. The question pose in this essay was why do we preserve nature? I believe that nature is kept preserved because if we do not uphold nature, we will not be alive. There are many things in this world that we ta ke for granted, nature being one of them. Even Berger describes nature as being energy and struggle he goes further to articulates, Nature has no promises. Berger fully understands the delicacy of nature but he fails to separate its overall beauty. Furthermore I think that from natures beauty humans can learn about themselves.An example of this can be hunting. Humans hunt for animals, however hunting teaches you a lot more then just how to shoot a gun. Hunting teaches you how to be patient. It teaches you to keep an eye on and to be thankful. Hunting is a form of nature. It is a way of life that happens within nature everyday. If we keep these positive attributes of nature in mind we will want to preserve the wilderness. The more we look into why we keep nature around the more we can learn about ourselves. flora CitedBerger, John. The White Bird. The Sense of Sight. NY Vintage, 1993. 5-11.Zwinger, Ann. A Desert World. Trans. Array Occasions for Writing- Evidence, Idea, Essay. Boston, MA Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2008. 415-416. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment