Friday, April 12, 2019

Jury Nullification Paper Essay Example for Free

Jury Nullification root EssayIn this paper I am waiver to explain whether ethnicity influences judgeshiproom proceedings and juridic practices, and give whatsoever examples of ethnicity-based dialog box nullification, a sanctioned doctrine of trial proceedings wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented of the instructions of the judge in order to reach a finding of fact based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact.Ethnicity in law woo is an outstanding factor depending were your venue of mash is located, and the jurors selected to the court. If in a court room at that place be jurors that are all white and are jurors for a case involving a white man that killed a African American man, may cause the jurors to listen to the white man case rather than the African American individual. In some cases if the white man story is little probable to happen the jurors will past have to tak e more time and listen closer to both of the stories. Jurors are told when in court that they have to judge by the facts and not by preferences in ethnic groups or color of skin, some do listen some do not take both facts they just prefer to select the person who is less guilty or if they see a similarities in themselves with an offender.One example of a preferred jury was a case that took place on the night of February 26, 2012, in Stanford, Florida, George Zimmerman fatally jab Trayvon Martin, a 17 year old African American high school student. George Zimmerman, a 28 year old Hispanic, was the neighborhood watch coordinator for the gated community where martin was temporarily staying and where the shooting took place. Martin and Zimmerman where in a face-off musical composition martin was walking thru the gated community while on the ground Zimmerman shot Martin killing him. When officers arrived on purview they took Zimmerman into custody and attended his injuries, then ques tioned for five hours.Under the state law of Florida it is legal to defend yourself while being under attack and you are able to use lethal force. Zimmerman stated that martin was reaching toward Zimmermans gun but no evidence was found. The jury decided that Zimmerman was not guilty, there was controversy in this case because martin was a preadolescent black kid who dressed different and was judged by that. The jury I believe looked at Martin as a bigger threat than Zimmerman.In this case a young black male was judged incorrectly by hatful who saw him as kid that was not going on the correct path, and on the other side they see a person who was keeping a watch on his community and keep them safe. Some people just see a Hispanic male getting away with murder and a African American kid who was killed harshly. For this case 5 of the 6 jurors were considered white and 1 mixed race, in this county were the case took place in Florida only 10 percent of the population are African Ameri can.Even though when selecting a jury there is people who make sure there are no bias selection of jurors, sometimes jurors when in court change their minds because they relate to the case or because some similar situations have happen to that juror or a close relative. When jurors relate to cases it starts to become a bias situation, for example if a case of a women that was beaten by a husband because of infidelity, some jurors if women will take the women side and will by chance go against the husband. Otherwise if the jurors are mostly men the men will tend to reduce prison term or even find a reason to liberate the husband accused of beating his married woman due to infidelity.When facing a court case such as the famous case of Rodney male monarch the jurors gave a harsh punishment to the police officers not because they were bias, but because the footage of the people who are there to wait on and protect were acting like animals and very unprofessional. In this situation t he jury were mainly concerned that these officers that were in duty to serve and protect the community can act so savagely, in this case there was a clear bias situation the jurors were not looking at the officers as heroes because they took down a man that was drugged up, the jurors saw the police beatinga man that was defense less and without any admirer.There will always be all sorts of bias and sometimes racism inside of the court room, jurors are chosen the best as possible but sometimes it just is not plenty to sentence a case correctly. Jurors have the responsibility to give the case to the innocent person and to help the judge make the correct decision, but sometimes jurors make mistakes and are guided by their emotions and not the facts, when that happens the case becomes a bias case and usually in favor of the person the jurors think is innocent.In my opinion jurors should be taught and learn on how to use the facts to see all the details of the case, jurors should also be taught different types of classes on looking at all the evidence in favor and not in favor, the jurors should also take in mind that the person being sentenced also have families and deserve a fair opportunity on their criminal case. The diversity on the juror stand should be always permitted I believe there should not be more Whites or Blacks or Hispanic jurors there should be a fair amount of jurors for all ethnicities this will bring a balance and a fair judgment of all the cases in court. This will bring more fairness and belief to the court system and will help the judges job easier and trust the people of the juror stand. To conclude, jurors should be a very great help for criminal cases but they always have to judge with intelligence and with fairness.

No comments:

Post a Comment